We Run the Experiments,
Then Publish the Evidence.

Original studies of African software products, run by the Liners team and volunteers. We define one task before we start, run it at every provider the same way, and publish what happened — the evidence, not a review.

A field study uses the product for real: real sign-ups, real identities, real transactions, the exact route an ordinary customer would take. A virtual study works from public information — documentation, pricing pages, and sandbox flows — when running the real journey is not possible or safe.

No. Brands cannot buy into a study, cannot preview findings, and cannot have them removed. Corrections are made in public with the change noted.

Every figure is published as a count against its own sample. Where the sample is too small to carry a rate, we mark it and say so. Wherever we can, several people run the same test independently on different days before we call a result a finding.

Two ways: suggest a product, service, or experience you think we should look into, or volunteer to run study tasks. Volunteers' answers are included in the published counts, but their names stay private.