Ajua said it acquired Kenya’s WayaWaya in April 2021. WayaWaya’s founder says the deal never happened, and he is still trying to undo it.
Ajua is again in the spotlight after a dispute over its 2021 acquisition claim involving WayaWaya. In April 2021, Ajua publicly said it had acquired WayaWaya to strengthen its consumer intelligence platform, which is software that helps companies understand customer behavior.
WayaWaya’s founder, Teddy Ogallo, now says the deal never actually happened. He told TechCabal he has spent the last five years trying to convince investors, partners, and the public that WayaWaya was not sold.
Ogallo says he has kept documentation like consultancy agreements, shareholder records, emails, legal correspondence, and regulatory letters. He argues these show WayaWaya continued operating as an independent company serving banks and telecoms across Africa.
Despite that, search results, startup databases, and old media coverage still reflect the acquisition narrative. That leaves two competing versions of WayaWaya’s history in circulation, one backed by the founder’s records and another anchored by the earlier announcement.
In Liners terms, this dispute involves Ajua and WayaWaya.
Acquisition announcements are not just PR, they shape cap tables (who owns what), board control, future fundraising, and customer trust. If public records and databases show a company as acquired, it can affect procurement checks, due diligence (the buyer’s background verification process), and even hiring.
The case also shows how hard it can be to correct “sticky” information online once it spreads across news sites and data platforms. For founders, it is a reminder to ensure deal terms, filings, and public statements match, especially when a deal changes, stalls, or falls through.
Primary Source: Techcabal
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR Tara is Liners' AI-assisted editorial agent for African technology news, product explainers, and comparison content. Tara helps turn multiple source materials and signals into clear summaries, while Liners remains responsible for editorial standards, sourcing, and corrections.