iKhokha vs Payfast
TL;DR: If you need in-person card payments plus online tools in one bundle, iKhokha is usually the more operationally complete choice. If you are ecommerce-first and care most about payment-method breadth and deep plugin coverage, Payfast is typically the better fit.
Accept card payments anywhere, anytime.

Accept online and in-store payments across South Africa

iKhokha vs Payfast at a glance
Scores are 1–10 per criterion. The highlighted cell wins its row; tied rows carry no marker.| Criteria | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing How predictable and competitive costs are, including setup costs (hardware), monthly fees, and published transaction pricing clarity. | 7wins Clear entry pricing, but hardware and bundle choices affect total cost. | 6 Often no monthly fee on Aggregation, but exact transaction pricing is harder to verify quickly. |
| Payment methods and channels Breadth of ways customers can pay, including online methods, in-person acceptance, recurring payments, and cross-border capabilities. | 8 Strong omnichannel coverage, especially for in-person card acceptance. | 9wins Excellent online payment-method breadth and ecommerce checkout tooling. |
| Integrations and developer experience Availability and quality of plugins, APIs, SDKs, documentation, and how easily merchants can integrate payments into websites and apps. | 7 Good core integrations, smaller ecosystem than Payfast. | 9wins Broad plugin ecosystem and mature API approach. |
| SME operations and business tools How well the product supports day-to-day merchant workflows beyond payment acceptance, for example invoicing, reporting, funding, and sales tooling. | 9wins All-in-one SME toolkit beyond payments. | 7 Strong checkout operations, fewer broader business-management features. |
| Payout speed and cash flow support How quickly merchants can access funds, and the availability of tools that improve cash flow (for example fast payouts or financing). | 8 Cash-flow features are a notable differentiator for SMEs. | 8 Fast payout positioning, but timing may vary by setup and checks. |
| Security, compliance, and trust signals Security posture claims, compliance standards, and scale or adoption signals that reduce risk for merchants. | 7 Established local provider, but fewer widely cited public security certifications. | 9wins Stronger publicly stated security and scale signals. |
| African market fit and local payment practicality How well each product fits African operating realities, including South Africa focus, local settlement, support access, and practical merchant onboarding. | 9wins Very strong South Africa SMB fit, including in-person selling needs. | 8 Strong South Africa focus, with clearer international selling support via multi-currency. |
How predictable and competitive costs are, including setup costs (hardware), monthly fees, and published transaction pricing clarity.
Breadth of ways customers can pay, including online methods, in-person acceptance, recurring payments, and cross-border capabilities.
Availability and quality of plugins, APIs, SDKs, documentation, and how easily merchants can integrate payments into websites and apps.
How well the product supports day-to-day merchant workflows beyond payment acceptance, for example invoicing, reporting, funding, and sales tooling.
How quickly merchants can access funds, and the availability of tools that improve cash flow (for example fast payouts or financing).
Security posture claims, compliance standards, and scale or adoption signals that reduce risk for merchants.
How well each product fits African operating realities, including South Africa focus, local settlement, support access, and practical merchant onboarding.
iKhokha and Payfast are two of South Africa’s best-known options for accepting payments, but they solve slightly different problems. iKhokha is built around helping small and medium-sized businesses take in-person card payments (via card machines and Tap on Phone) while also offering online payments and adjacent business tools like invoicing, a lightweight webstore, reporting, and access to funding. This makes it attractive for merchants that sell across channels, for example a retail shop that also takes WhatsApp orders, issues invoices, or wants a simple online storefront.
Payfast is primarily an online payment gateway that focuses on improving checkout conversion and operational handling for online merchants. It emphasizes broad payment-method support (18+ methods), subscriptions, split payments, refunds, and a large ecosystem of plugins and APIs. For businesses running WooCommerce, custom ecommerce sites, or marketplace-style flows, Payfast’s integration depth and checkout features are often the main reason to shortlist it.
Many South African businesses compare these two because they want to balance three things: (1) total cost and fee transparency, (2) how fast they can go live across web and physical sales, and (3) whether the platform can scale from “take a few payments” to “run payments as a core workflow” without forcing a painful switch later. Both are locally relevant for South Africa, with local settlement and merchant onboarding aligned to local compliance expectations; the key decision is whether your dominant need is omnichannel retail operations (iKhokha) or integration-heavy online checkout (Payfast).
Full analysis, criterion by criterion
Each criterion below breaks down the same 1–10 scores product by product, with the reasoning behind each rating.Pricing
How predictable and competitive costs are, including setup costs (hardware), monthly fees, and published transaction pricing clarity.
▾
Pricing
How predictable and competitive costs are, including setup costs (hardware), monthly fees, and published transaction pricing clarity.
iKhokha
7Card machines have upfront pricing (for example, iK Flyer Lite from R699; iK Flyer R1,499; iK POS R7,499) and Tap on Phone is advertised as free, which helps with predictability. Online pricing is publicly shown in percentage terms (for example, 2.85% excl. VAT for local card online payments; Instant EFT and international card rates differ). Total cost can still vary by device and operating model, so merchants should validate all applicable fees for their chosen setup.
Payfast
6Payfast is commonly positioned as transaction-fee-based for Aggregation with no monthly fees, and offers a separate Gateway option for merchants with their own merchant account. However, a complete current pricing table and fee tiers could not be consistently verified from publicly available sources in a single, up-to-date reference. That makes side-by-side cost forecasting less straightforward until you confirm the exact fees for your account type and payment methods.
Payment methods and channels
Breadth of ways customers can pay, including online methods, in-person acceptance, recurring payments, and cross-border capabilities.
▾
Payment methods and channels
Breadth of ways customers can pay, including online methods, in-person acceptance, recurring payments, and cross-border capabilities.
iKhokha
8iKhokha supports in-person card payments via card machines and Tap on Phone, plus online payments via gateway, payment links, invoices, and buy buttons. It is well suited to merchants combining counter sales with remote orders. Payment-method breadth beyond cards and key online options is less clearly positioned than Payfast’s “18+ methods” claim.
Payfast
9Payfast supports 18+ payment methods and includes online checkout features like subscriptions (tokenization), split payments, refunds, and payment requests. It also supports multi-currency pricing, which can matter for South African merchants selling internationally. For purely in-person acceptance, Payfast is not positioned as a hardware-first POS provider, so many merchants pair it with separate in-store tools.
Integrations and developer experience
Availability and quality of plugins, APIs, SDKs, documentation, and how easily merchants can integrate payments into websites and apps.
▾
Integrations and developer experience
Availability and quality of plugins, APIs, SDKs, documentation, and how easily merchants can integrate payments into websites and apps.
iKhokha
7iKhokha supports popular SME platforms like Wix and WooCommerce and offers an iK Pay API with developer documentation. For straightforward ecommerce and payment link workflows, this is often sufficient. The overall plugin ecosystem appears narrower than Payfast’s broad platform coverage, which can matter for less common stacks.
Payfast
9Payfast advertises 70+ plugins and platforms, plus APIs and SDKs for custom integrations. Separate documentation paths for Aggregation and Gateway can help different merchant types implement correctly. This breadth typically reduces integration time for established ecommerce stacks and marketplaces.
SME operations and business tools
How well the product supports day-to-day merchant workflows beyond payment acceptance, for example invoicing, reporting, funding, and sales tooling.
▾
SME operations and business tools
How well the product supports day-to-day merchant workflows beyond payment acceptance, for example invoicing, reporting, funding, and sales tooling.
iKhokha
9iKhokha bundles payments with invoicing, dashboards/insights, a webstore option, and add-ons like a debit card for payouts and access to cash advance funding (up to R1 million advertised). This reduces the need for separate tools for early-stage and growing SMEs. Some of these features are South Africa-specific, which is great locally but less relevant if you operate across multiple African markets.
Payfast
7Payfast provides solid operational payment features such as refunds, split payments, payout handling, subscriptions, and payment requests. These are valuable for ecommerce operations and marketplaces. It is less positioned as an all-in-one SME business suite, so merchants may still need separate tools for invoicing, storefronts, and broader operational reporting.
Payout speed and cash flow support
How quickly merchants can access funds, and the availability of tools that improve cash flow (for example fast payouts or financing).
▾
Payout speed and cash flow support
How quickly merchants can access funds, and the availability of tools that improve cash flow (for example fast payouts or financing).
iKhokha
8iKhokha promotes same-day payouts via a debit card and also offers cash advance funding, which can be meaningful for SMEs managing stock and payroll cycles. This can reduce reliance on external lenders for short-term liquidity. Exact payout timelines can vary by product and risk checks, so merchants should confirm settlement terms for their account.
Payfast
8Payfast markets immediate payout access (within minutes) as a benefit, which can help ecommerce businesses with tight cash flow. Payout timing in practice can depend on merchant profile, account configuration, and compliance checks, which are not fully verifiable in a single public source. If payout speed is mission-critical, confirm realistic settlement windows during onboarding.
Security, compliance, and trust signals
Security posture claims, compliance standards, and scale or adoption signals that reduce risk for merchants.
▾
Security, compliance, and trust signals
Security posture claims, compliance standards, and scale or adoption signals that reduce risk for merchants.
iKhokha
7iKhokha is a well-established South African merchant platform with broad adoption among SMEs and supports major card acceptance in-person and online. However, prominent public claims like a specific PCI-DSS level are less consistently cited in easily verifiable sources compared with Payfast. Merchants with strict vendor risk requirements may need to request compliance documentation directly.
Payfast
9Payfast is commonly described as PCI-DSS Level 1 and is positioned as trusted by a large merchant base (for example, 80,000+ merchants is widely cited). These signals can matter for businesses that need strong assurances for online payment processing. As with any payment provider, merchants should still review dispute handling, chargeback processes, and account controls.
African market fit and local payment practicality
How well each product fits African operating realities, including South Africa focus, local settlement, support access, and practical merchant onboarding.
▾
African market fit and local payment practicality
How well each product fits African operating realities, including South Africa focus, local settlement, support access, and practical merchant onboarding.
iKhokha
9iKhokha is built explicitly for South African business owners and supports both web and mobile apps that fit local merchant workflows. Its in-person acceptance options and SME tools map well to common South African retail and services use cases. Availability outside South Africa and cross-border expansion support is less clearly positioned.
Payfast
8Payfast is strongly oriented toward South African merchants and widely used for local ecommerce. Multi-currency pricing can make it easier to sell internationally from South Africa, even if your operations remain local. Like iKhokha, it is not a pan-African gateway by default, so businesses expanding into multiple African countries may still need additional local PSP coverage.
Verdict: which should you choose?
The verdict weighs the criterion scores against who each product serves best.Choose iKhokha if you are a South African SME that needs in-person card acceptance (card machine or Tap on Phone) plus practical selling tools like payment links and invoicing, and you prefer an all-in-one merchant workflow. The tradeoff is upfront hardware cost if you need a device, and some fees can be easier to understand once you’ve picked a specific setup.
Choose Payfast if your business is website-first and you want more payment-method coverage, strong subscription and split-payment capabilities, and broad plugin and API support for ecommerce platforms. The main caveat is that exact pricing can be harder to compare at a glance because Payfast supports different models (Aggregation vs Gateway), so you should confirm the fee schedule for your specific route before deciding.
Overall, neither is universally “better”. iKhokha tends to win for hybrid online plus in-store merchants that want operational simplicity, while Payfast tends to win for online merchants optimizing checkout flexibility and integrations.
Some details in this comparison could not be fully verified. Please double-check the following before making decisions:
- Payfast’s exact current transaction fee tiers and any conditional charges could not be consistently verified from publicly available sources in a single up-to-date pricing reference
- End-to-end payout timelines for both providers can vary by merchant risk checks and configuration, and exact real-world settlement SLAs could not be independently confirmed
- iKhokha’s full security certification posture (for example specific PCI-DSS level statements) was not consistently verifiable from widely cited public sources compared with Payfast’s claims
- Availability and support scope for merchants operating outside South Africa could not be verified clearly for either product, beyond Payfast’s multi-currency pricing positioning
iKhokha vs Payfast FAQs
Which is better for a physical shop that also sells online, iKhokha or Payfast?
▾
For most hybrid merchants, iKhokha is the more complete starting point because it combines in-person acceptance (card machines or Tap on Phone) with online tools like payment links and invoicing. Payfast is better if the online store is the main channel and you already have separate in-store POS/card acceptance.
Which platform supports more payment methods for ecommerce checkout?
▾
Payfast is positioned with broader coverage (18+ payment methods) and has strong checkout options like subscriptions and split payments. iKhokha supports online cards and key online flows (gateway, links, invoices), but its payment-method breadth is less prominently positioned than Payfast’s.
Is there a monthly fee for iKhokha or Payfast?
▾
iKhokha is typically hardware-led with upfront device costs and transaction fees; Tap on Phone is advertised as free. Payfast commonly promotes an Aggregation option with no monthly fees, but exact pricing and fee schedules can vary, so confirm the latest terms for your account type before committing.
Which is easier to integrate with WooCommerce or other ecommerce platforms?
▾
Both can work with common ecommerce setups, but Payfast generally has the edge due to its larger plugin ecosystem (often cited as 70+ platforms) and mature API tooling. iKhokha supports WooCommerce and Wix and offers an API, which is often enough for standard SME ecommerce builds.
Which is better for subscriptions and recurring billing?
▾
Payfast is usually the stronger choice because it supports subscriptions and tokenization for recurring card payments. iKhokha focuses more on SME selling workflows (in-person plus online) and may be a better fit when recurring billing is not the core requirement.
Other Comparisons to Consider
Ozow vs Payfast: Complete Comparison (2026)
Ozow is typically the better pick if most of your volume is Pay by Bank (Instant EFT) and you want the lowest possible bank-payment costs in South Africa. Payfast is usually stronger if you need a broader, one-stop gateway, especially cards, subscriptions, and many ready-made ecommerce plugins.
Aug 13, 2026
ReadPayfast vs Paystack: Complete Comparison (2026)
Payfast is typically the better fit for South Africa-first merchants who need the widest local payment-method mix (Instant EFT, QR, Mobicred, store cards) and optional in-store acceptance. Paystack is usually the better fit for developer-led teams and sellers who want fast setup, payment pages/product links, and a more multi-market African orientation. Pricing is close and highly use-case dependent, Paystack is often slightly cheaper on South African local card fees in third-party comparisons, while Payfast can be competitive at volume and across alternative methods.
Aug 12, 2026
ReadiKhokha vs Yoco: Complete Comparison (2026)
Both iKhokha and Yoco are strong South African SME payment platforms with no-rental, low-commitment positioning. Choose iKhokha for broader online payments, add-on business tools, and clearer published online pricing; choose Yoco for POS-first workflows, in-store operations, and real-time sales management.
Jul 22, 2026
ReadiKhokha vs SnapScan vs Yoco: Complete Comparison (2026)
If you need a full card terminal plus POS workflows, Yoco is typically the strongest all-in-one choice, while iKhokha often wins on low upfront hardware and broader online payment tools. If you mainly want a fast, low-friction way to accept QR and payment links with minimal setup, SnapScan is the lightweight option that often complements a card machine.
Jun 9, 2026
Read