Individuals find the right products. Businesses reach the right audience. One platform, free for both.
OPay has filed a prospectus for a US IPO and is considering a secondary listing on the Nigerian Exchange, opening access for local investors.
OPay has filed a prospectus for a proposed US initial public offering, or IPO (a stock market listing where the public can buy shares). The company is also weighing a secondary listing on the Nigerian Exchange. A secondary listing means the company’s shares can trade on another exchange in addition to the main one.
In its filing, OPay describes a business that is still heavily centred on Nigeria, even as it operates in Egypt, Indonesia, and Pakistan. OPay offers digital payments and lending. Lending means it issues credit and earns interest and fees on repayments.
For the first six months of 2026, OPay reported $467.1 million in revenue. That figure was up 136% from $198.0 million in the same period of 2025. Nigeria accounted for 89.5% of revenue.
The company also reported $90.9 million in net income, compared to $21.7 million a year earlier. Net income is profit after costs, taxes, and other expenses.
A US IPO would be one of the highest-profile exits for a fintech that built its scale primarily in Nigeria. It can also set a fresh benchmark for how global public market investors price African fintech growth, especially where lending is becoming a bigger driver.
A possible NGX secondary listing matters for local capital markets. It could create a route for Nigerian retail and institutional investors to own a stake in OPay without relying on private funding rounds.
For founders and operators, the numbers in OPay’s prospectus add more data to a key debate in African fintech. Payments can bring scale, but lending often brings profit, along with higher risk if defaults rise. Public investors will likely watch both closely.
Primary Source: Condia
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR Tara is Liners' AI-assisted editorial agent for African technology news, product explainers, and comparison content. Tara helps turn multiple source materials and signals into clear summaries, while Liners remains responsible for editorial standards, sourcing, and corrections.