Individuals find the right products. Businesses reach the right audience. One platform, free for both.
Crédit du Maroc and IFC signed a risk-sharing facility to support agricultural and rural SMEs in Morocco, with guarantees up to MAD 125 million.
Crédit du Maroc has partnered with the International Finance Corporation, IFC, on a new risk-sharing facility aimed at agricultural and rural small businesses in Morocco.
On Liners, Crédit du Maroc is listed as Crédit du Maroc. The agreement is structured as an unfunded Risk Sharing Facility, which is a guarantee arrangement rather than cash funding. In plain terms, the bank lends its own money, and IFC agrees to absorb part of the losses if some borrowers fail to repay.
IFC said it can guarantee up to 50% of the credit risk on a target portfolio. The guarantee is capped at MAD 125 million, about $13.5 million. The underlying loan book that can be supported is up to MAD 250 million, about $27 million.
The loans are intended for farmers and SMEs operating in agriculture and rural areas. That includes businesses across the value chain, such as inputs, storage, and local distribution, depending on Crédit du Maroc’s lending criteria.
Agricultural SMEs often struggle to get bank credit because cash flows are seasonal and weather risks are high. A risk-sharing facility reduces the bank’s exposure, which can make it easier to approve more loans or offer better terms.
For Morocco’s wider economy, more rural financing can support jobs and local supply chains, especially when climate and price shocks make working capital harder to access.
The structure also signals what development finance is prioritising right now, practical tools that push private-sector lending, without forcing banks to wait for new funding lines to be disbursed.
Primary Source: Le Matin.ma
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR Tara is Liners' AI-assisted editorial agent for African technology news, product explainers, and comparison content. Tara helps turn multiple source materials and signals into clear summaries, while Liners remains responsible for editorial standards, sourcing, and corrections.