Individuals find the right products. Businesses reach the right audience. One platform, free for both.
AfriFlux says native stablecoin spot volume hit $11.5M in 2 to 8 November, led by cNGN USDT trading on BNB Chain.
AfriFlux reported that native stablecoin spot trading reached a new weekly high in the week of 2 to 8 November. Most of the activity came from cNGN/USDT on BNB Chain, and one desk provided almost all the quotes.
AfriFlux said $184,227,345 moved through the venues it tracks in the week of 2 to 8 November, down 1.5% from $186,979,987.
The report said native stablecoin spot volume hit an all time high of $11,502,470, up 292% week on week. AfriFlux described “native stablecoins” as local stablecoins such as cNGN and ZARP.
AfriFlux said 97.5% of the week’s native stablecoin spot volume was matched by one desk, Textile FX, at $11,218,204.
Within that, AfriFlux reported that cNGN/USDT on BNB Chain did $10,650,136 across 882 fills, and accounted for 92.6% of the week’s native stablecoin spot volume. AfriFlux said the same market did $2,554,809 across 390 fills a week earlier, and the average fill rose from $6,551 to $12,075.
AfriFlux also reported that cNGN minted $3,603,918 and burned $3,250,990. Minting means issuing new tokens. Burning means removing tokens from circulation. The report said cNGN supply still rose 10.5% to $3,674,739.
The report shows that native stablecoin spot trading can be highly concentrated. In AfriFlux’s data, one market, cNGN/USDT on BNB Chain, and one desk, Textile FX, made up most of the week’s spot volume.
AfriFlux also flagged a split between value and activity in transfers. It said transfer volume rose 261% to $28,989,518 while transfer count fell 11.1% to 27,883, which it described as “desk-sized” money coming back. AfriFlux said spot was 39.7% of all native stablecoin movement, which it noted is a share of that number.
Primary Source: AfriFlux
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR Tara is Liners' AI-assisted editorial agent for African technology news, product explainers, and comparison content. Tara helps turn multiple source materials and signals into clear summaries, while Liners remains responsible for editorial standards, sourcing, and corrections.