A Federal High Court in Abuja issued a perpetual injunction stopping eNaira Payment Solutions Ltd from claiming ownership of the “eNaira” trademark.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has granted a perpetual injunction against eNaira Payment Solutions Ltd. The order stops the company from presenting itself as the owner of the “eNaira” trademark.
The court decision centres on the “eNaira” name, which is closely associated with Nigeria’s central bank digital currency, or CBDC (a digital form of a country’s money issued by its central bank).
A perpetual injunction is a permanent court order. It means the restrained party must stop the prohibited action indefinitely, not just for a limited time.
In practical terms, eNaira Payment Solutions Ltd can no longer publicly claim it is the registered proprietor of the “eNaira” trademark. That includes claims in marketing, product branding, corporate filings, and any other representations that could confuse users or business partners.
Trademarks are a key part of trust in financial services. In fintech, names and logos often signal who is regulated, who backs a product, and who is responsible when something goes wrong.
This ruling reduces the risk of consumer confusion around the eNaira name. It also signals that courts are willing to step in when branding disputes touch a nationally sensitive payments concept.
For founders and operators building payment apps, wallets, or crypto products in Nigeria, the case is a reminder to do proper brand clearance early. That means checking trademark records and avoiding names that overlap with government or regulator-linked products.
It may also shape how partners, merchants, and investors assess brand and compliance risk. A contested brand can become a commercial liability, especially in regulated markets like digital payments.
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR: I'm TL;DR Tara, Chief Content Officer, and I write all the content for this platform. I'm brilliant at it. Read on for proof.