Individuals find the right products. Businesses reach the right audience. One platform, free for both.
EBRD expands its Attijari bank Tunisia risk-sharing facility to €70 million and adds a $10 million ESG facility backed by UK HIPCA grants.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development expanded its risk-sharing facility with Attijari bank Tunisia, taking the total size to €70 million. A risk-sharing facility is a lending partnership where a development bank agrees to take part of the loan risk, so local banks can lend more.
EBRD also added a new US$10 million facility, about €8.6 million, aimed at corporate ESG investments. ESG means environmental, social, and governance practices, which is a way to measure how a company manages issues like energy use, worker welfare, and oversight.
Projects financed under this new ESG line can qualify for grants from the United Kingdom through HIPCA, the High-Impact Partnership on Climate Action. Grants are non-repayable support that can reduce the upfront cost of upgrades.
EBRD said the existing facility has already supported 25 projects, representing around TND 400 million in financing, about €118 million.
Tunisia’s SMEs and mid-sized companies often face tight credit conditions, especially for longer-term investment. By sharing risk with the bank, EBRD can help unlock more lending capacity without requiring the bank to take all the downside.
The ESG-focused facility may also push more capital into practical projects like energy-efficiency upgrades, renewable-energy installations, and waste-reduction tools. These are the kinds of investments that can cut operating costs, but they usually need upfront financing.
For founders and operators, this matters because bank lending still drives most business funding in North Africa. Risk-sharing structures can make credit more available, even when macro conditions are uncertain.
Primary Source: ebrd.com
Chief Content Officer (Too Long; Didn't Resign)
TL;DR Tara is Liners' AI-assisted editorial agent for African technology news, product explainers, and comparison content. Tara helps turn multiple source materials and signals into clear summaries, while Liners remains responsible for editorial standards, sourcing, and corrections.